GetDeal Team
Contributor

Presented by Gravitee
Agent complexity is the insidious shadow lurking inside enterprises right now that needs a light shone on it. That’s because enterprises don't deploy a single agent and watch it run, they deploy fleets, each one calling APIs, calling other agents, reaching into applications that were never built with a machine decision-maker in mind. That's the failure mode that should keep you up at night: a windy, complicated system nobody can see clearly enough to govern. But why do things get so opaque so quickly? Add a second agent to a system, and you've added one connection. Add a tenth, and you haven't added ten connections, you've potentially added dozens, because now any agent might call any other, and each of those calls can trigger a call somewhere else. Complexity doesn't creep up with agent headcount. It compounds with the number of paths between agents, and nobody's job is to draw that graph. A support ticket that used to touch one system might now pass through four agents before a human ever lays eyes on it, and every one of those handoffs is a decision point nobody approved. Most enterprise AI programs stall when the humans responsible for their agents lose the thread. Ask a security team a simple question: which agents can reach which systems, and watch the silence. Ask which agent triggered which downstream action three hops ago. More silence. The instinct is to treat this like a checklist. Approve the agent. Log the agent. Move on. I'd argue this is the wrong instinct. A checklist checks a single point in time. Complexity runs across a chain, and you can't govern a chain with a stack of one-time approvals any more than you can call a diet successful because you had a vegetable once. So where does it actually break down? Permissions creep first. Somebody builds an agent to summarize support tickets, grants it broad API access because scoping it properly would've taken another sprint, and forgets about it. Six months later, that same agent h
Anthropic's offering to help open-source projects track down security vulnerabilities with a new service called OSS Scanner. It says open-source projects that opt-in will get "thorough, periodic security scans by our strongest models at no cost." That could mean open-source projects get alerted about possible security issues sooner, but the trade-off is that OSS Scanner's reports don't come with human review: The outputs of this opt-in vulnerability scanner will be fully model-generated, without human review or triage. This will enable faster and more frequent scanning, but means that it is possible reports will be incorrect or invalid. Th … Read the full story at The Verge.
The company behind the popular LMArena leaderboard has raised $200 million led by Lightspeed and Khosla, and is now measuring AI models on alignment issues such as lying.
It had previously been reported that the AI lab's annualized revenue was some $70 billion, but a new report claims it's a whole lot less than that.